Vital Speeches of the Day logo CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE
 
 
 
 

All rhetoric aside … this guy does speechwriters’ image no favors

March 10, 2010
By David Murray

If a former presidential speechwriter is going to take hard-line positions and go toe-to-toe with Jon Stewart, why can’t he look more like Clint Eastwood, and less like Otto Pilot, from the movie Airplane? And why can’t he have a sense of humor?

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Exclusive - Marc Thiessen Extended Interview Pt. 1
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Reform

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

We want to know: How (in the world) do you figure out where to place your speaker?

March 8, 2010
By David Murray

The possibilities aren’t quite endless, but for executive communication pros trying to match multiple speakers with hundreds of potential speaking platforms, they might as well be.

How do other executive communication pros identify the best conferences, summits or city clubs to place their speakers?

The best way to find out is to tell us how you do it—and let us compare your methods with your peers’ and then issue our report.

Vital Speeches is partnering with CEO-reputation guru Leslie Gaines-Ross of the global PR firm Weber Shandwick, on a survey about business leadership conferences and events.

Take the survey, and get an executive summary of the results for free.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

And the winner for best Oscar acceptance speech goes to …

March 8, 2010
By David Murray

… Sandra Bullock!

Any arguments?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Vital Speeches of the Day podcast: INTERVIEW—On How to Teach Speakers How to Be Charismatic

March 4, 2010
By David Murray

INTERVIEW: On How to Teach Speakers How to Be Charismatic

Hilari Weinstein says she’s more than a speaking coach—she’s an authenticity coach, who teaches speakers how to find their own magnetism. We give her a good grilling. (6 min.)

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Congratulations to winners of the 2010 Cicero Speechwriting Awards

March 3, 2010
By David Murray

All speechwriters would do well to download for free and read These Vital Speeches: The Best of the 2010 Cicero Speechwriting Awards.

This is the state of the art.

(Do you think your work measures up? Then join our mailing list for updates on next year’s program.)

Congratulations to our winners. You rose to the top of a big heap this year, and I speak for all the Cicero judges when I say reading your work was a pleasure, an education and occasionally a real thrill.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

President Obama delivers a pretty good ‘Here’s the &#&!@ing deal’ speech on healthcare

March 3, 2010
By David Murray

In every consensus-driven organization from the corporate boardroom down to the most namby-pamby nonprofit, there does come a time when the leader needs to say: All right, I’ve heard from everybody at least twice, and I’ve come to a decision. Here’s the $#&$#ing deal ….

President Obama delivered a here’s-the-deal speech on health care reform today, and I thought he had the recipe about right: One part exasperation, three parts determination, one part resignation. You agree?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Australia prime minister: I’m a very good wizard. I’m just a very bad communicator.

March 2, 2010
By David Murray

Vital Speeches‘ Australia correspondent Rodney Gray keeps us posted on the tortured language of Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

Now, deep into his first term and with his popularity flagging, Rudd is “doing the political mea culpa thing at present,” Gray writes.

Mostly, what Rudd is saying is, essentially that his failure thus far has been one of communication, not politics or policy. He told the Australian Associated Press:

I think it’s also fair to say, in terms of one of the other criticisms made of yours truly, as I am probably not the world’s best communicator. (I) take that on the chin. Someone said to me the other day, when it comes to communication, I think it’s fair to say that as a communicator I make a first-class policy wonk—I kind of get that. I understand the criticism. But you know something, I don’t think in this business you get judged in the end on the basis of the quality of your one-liners. You get judged on the basis of whether you have delivered on the ground, on the basics.

If he really thinks of communication as a series of “one-liners,” I think we’ve got the problem identified already. But much more likely, this is a disingenuous apology and an implied promise to try to change his style so his constituents will come to appreciate his substance.

It’s not the way to bet.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Speechwriters’ own big rock candy mountain

March 1, 2010
By David Murray

I’ll hope to regale you in other posts with yarns and insights gathered during a happy week I spent in Phoenix last week. I was there connecting with my speechwriting peeps at a conference, and also my colleagues at McMurry, the company that publishes Vital Speeches of the Day.

After the “speechwriting jam session” I delivered at the conference, a number of people came up and told me the session had given them goosebumps or made them cry. Same here, I told them.

Though I’d seen or read these speech excerpts dozens of times before, being able to share them with other communicators was emotional for me too.

Many of the discussions with the speechwriters and with my McMurry mates centered on the new community that’s growing around the old magazine, Vital Speeches.

I thought of this group of speech geeks, and my happy position as a facilitator and sometime sparker of these conversations, as I read another anachronistic magazine on the flight home.

Ring Magazine was one thing half a century ago, when boxing was still a major American sport. Now that boxing is despised in many quarters and ignored in most others, it may come as a surprise that Ring still comes out every month. What surprised me, a fight fan but not a fight man, was how wonderful a read Ring still is.

In fact, it prompted me to ask and answer a pretty old question:

What is a great read?

A great read is when you intend to flip through something but find yourself frustrated by frequent stops, because you never see an article that you ought to be interested in. Quite the opposite: You notice the woman in the seat next to you is looking scornfully at the gruesome knockout photo you’ve been staring at for a minute, like it’s pornography.

“I know,” you want to hasten to tell her. “It’s really awful, isn’t it?”

I guess it’s natural to feel a little embarrassed when we find ourselves following our real fascinations, rather than studying the things we really ought to care about.

That’s the feeling I want my Vital Speeches pals to have when they come to VSOTD.com and its various social media forums.

The world tells communicators they have to think like business people, that the results are all that matters, that strategy trumps tactics, that language is less important than money.

We accept what we have to of all that, in order to get along out there.

But it’s not how we feel.

And fresh off this good trip, I’m feeling privileged to make my living and spend my time creating places for us communication tramps to talk about what is important to us—human beings, and how they talk to each other—no matter what anyone else thinks.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Vital Speeches of the Day podcast: EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATION FORUM—How to classify the various species of executive?

February 19, 2010
By David Murray

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATION FORUM: How to classify the various species of executive?

Executive communicators need to serve different levels of execs via different means. But how to tell who’s who in the zoo? One executive communicator has created a filing system. (3 min.)

 

Click here for more FREE podcasts on the subject of executive communications.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

What did you think of the Tiger Woods statement?

February 19, 2010
By David Murray

I offered a fan’s perspective on my personal blog. My only speechwriterly reaction is this: You can’t always tell when a speech has been written by a speechwriter, but you definitely can tell when one hasn’t. And the result of that, in the case of Woods’ statement, was mostly good, despite the weirdness and unevenness. Or because of it.

What was your take, speech fans?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!