Vital Speeches of the Day logo DIGITAL BUSINESS
 
 
 
 

CEO surprised to discover that employees want to know what kind of person he is

May 22, 2013
By David Murray

A couple of years ago I wrote “Murray’s Manifesto,” which claimed that the only thing employees want to know from the CEO and other top execs is:

They want to know what kind of people they are working for.

Let me repeat: They want to know what kind of people they are working for.

That’s all they want to know: What kind of people they are working for.

But that’s a lot: They want to know how smart are the people they’re working for. How honest. How empathetic. How interested in new ideas. How down to earth. How consistent. How careful. How generous of spirit. How forward-looking. And how committed to the welfare of the employees.

“That is so true,” wrote a commenter, “I wish my boss would read this.”

Of course, if the bosses read Writing Boots, we couldn’t say half the stuff we do here. But one boss did discover my principle without my help. CEO Harry Herington was interviewed for last Sunday’s installment of the weekly “Corner Office” Q&A in The New York Times business section. The chief of the online services firm NIC Inc. talks about how a motorcycle changed the way employees saw him and changed his “entire perspective” on how to communicate with them.

Shortly after Herington bought a Harley, the company was organizing a conference of its general managers.

So I had 200 employees in Oklahoma City for a marketing conference and I thought, I’ve got this brand new motorcycle. It’s about a six-hour drive from our headquarters near Kansas City. I decided to ride the motorcycle to the conference.

So I pull up and I’ve got all my leathers on. I walk in carrying my helmet and everybody’s dumbfounded. I became the buzz of the conference. The next thing I know, everybody’s out looking at my bike. I had so many fingerprints on it because the employees were just swarming this bike. They thought it was the coolest thing.

I started riding it to our offices in different states. I’d take everyone to dinner, and they would ask me why I bought a motorcycle, and then we would start talking casually about the company. I thought, “Wow, this is a very comfortable, easy setting.” I started getting phone calls from my general managers in different cities, saying, “We want you to come visit us on the motorcycle. The employees think this is really cool.”

So he started an “Ask the CEO” forum—you know, the kind where nobody says anything except the Eddie Haskel jagoff who wants to prove how smart he is. Except, in Herington’s meetings,

They were asking me all sorts of personal questions, and it kind of got everybody’s guard down, so they felt more comfortable.

I had expected people to ask me about our five-year strategy. But I started getting questions like: “Where did you go to school?” … “Why did you get into law enforcement?” “Why did you leave law enforcement?” “How many kids do you have?” I’m on Facebook a lot, too. So people would say, “I see that you like to wear pink shirts when you play golf. Why?

I would say, especially early on, 80 percent of the questions were personal and 20 percent were about business.

Why?

They want to trust the leadership. They want to trust that you’re making the right decisions. And it’s not so much whether you’re making the right decisions as far as strategy. It’s more, can they trust you to come up with the strategy, and to make the right decisions when  issues come before you? They want to know the person. They want to trust the person. That was interesting. That really changed my entire perspective. …

Well all right, Harry Herington!

And because this is my blog, I’ll give myself the final word. In Murray’s Manifesto, I addressed communicators whose job it is to be the metaphorical motorcycle that invites employees to see executives as people:

If you can convince your employees that the people who run the organization are solid human beings who care about what they’re doing … well, that’s a team employees will find a way to help.

And if you lack the communication ability to get that across (virtuous executives not included)?

You’d better dance fast.

DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Communicators don’t die. They don’t even fade away.

May 15, 2013
By David Murray

PR legend Jack Felton died last Saturday at 84. You know what I remember about Felton? Exactly everything he wanted me to take away from our only meeting.

In a warm and enthusiastic way, he was talking about the importance of communication. Felton

He had a glass of water at the lectern and a piece of litmus paper in his hand.

He dipped the litmus paper into the glass, and as he pulled it out, he said—and these were his exact words—”Communication is the litmus test of management’s decision-making.”

Meaning that, to the extent you have a hard time communicating it, it’s probably a bad decision. And if it’s easy to get across, it’s probably a good decision. So communicators, and management, should use the attempt to conceive the communication of a new policy as a way to evaluate the policy and, if needed, modify it or scrap it altogether.

I accepted that, then and there, as a fundamental truth about our work.

Felton also remarked on parenthetically on the litmus paper gimmick, saying that connecting messages to visual things helped people remember them.

Yeah, I guess so.

You know when that meeting took place? Twenty one years ago. It was put on by an organization I don’t remember, it was held at some hotel reception to which my 23-year-old ass was sent for reasons long lost to me now.

Aside from trying to pretend I was enjoying my first glass of scotch, I remember only what Jack Felton wanted me to remember—and I remember it as warmly as I remember it well.

Thanks, Jack. We’ll take it from here. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Speechwriter: Are you working in an industry, or a racket?

May 8, 2013
By David Murray

Nelson Algren wrote about a guy who made money up and down Chicago’s Division Street by finding lost dogs and collecting rewards. Sounds pretty labor intensive until you understand that he was the one who stole the dogs in the first place.

Is that what your job seems like sometimes? Stealin’ dogs and gettin’ paid to find ‘em?

Well, it shouldn’t feel that way all the time. Especially if it’s a job like PR or communication, that don’t pay too good. Doin’ a job like that, you ought to feel like you’re doin’ some good in the world.

What’s the useful social purpose of PR? A couple Fridays ago, communication consultant Shel Holtz, PR professor Bill Sledzik and I were kicking it all around in Sledzik’s office at Kent State University.

As is my annoying habit, I was bemoaning the dearth of philosophical, moral and intellectual thinkers in the communication business these days. When I was a boy, I said, there were giants in this industry: practitioners like the late Chester Burger and Mike Emanuel, writers like Roger D’Aprix and the late Pat Jackson, who helped communicators understand the ideal and the real function of their work in a healthy society.

That’s kind of important. Because without an independent sense of your purpose, all you’ll ever be is a tool for the goon you’re working for this week.

Shel could tell I was just beginning to get cranked up, and he smiled patiently and shifted his weight, as choir members do when being preached to.

Sledzik interrupted me by quoting Jackson on the overarching purpose of our work: “Public relations enables individuals to participate in decisions that affect their lives.”

Oh. Right. Well. As long as we’re all clear on that, then I guess we don’t need any more philosophers.

The problem is we’re not all clear on that. And as a matter of fact, the concept hasn’t occurred to many of us.

So if that’s not what you’re doing in this world—and PR is not what I’m doing; I’m just a humble storyteller, which is an old and honorable trade, but only as moral as the storyteller’s own heart—what will you tell your maker or your children when they ask what exactly you did for your fellow human beings on this earth?

Cuz I’m afraid stealing dogs and collecting rewards is going to sound a little silly. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

VIDEO: Rowan Atkinson’s “drunken father-in-law” wedding toast

May 1, 2013
By David Murray

I offer this to prime the pump for a request. For a piece I’d like to compile here, please send any videos you have of truly terrible speeches to vseditor at mcmurry dot com. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Live-Tweeting on lecture-hall wall tempts social catastrophe

April 24, 2013
By David Murray

At a conference last week, they had an enormous screen where could be seen all the live Tweets about the conference.

The well-paid keynoter offered a stultifying list of loosely-related facts and quips designed to show the audience how knowledgeable the speaker was but to leave the audience both dumb and numb. I kept waiting for someone to post something.

“The emperor has no clothes,” for instance, is only 26 characters.

I was thinking more in terms of, “This speaker is a one-man circle jerk.”

And if you think that’s crass, you don’t want to hear the other Tweets that I spent the second half of the presentation dreaming up.

But everyone was too polite, or too afraid, to post something rude. Instead, they mindlessly tweeted the speaker’s bland “insights.” (Companies need to think strategically about social media, and the like.)

But if conference producers keep up this barbaric practice of letting people post their reactions to the speaker for everyone to see—a barbaric, in my opinion, because every speaker deserves the right to be heard out before being criticized—then some hilarious heckling is going to go down and a public-speaking Hindenburg is going to happen.

Or has such a disaster already occurred?

Speechwriter, tell me your experiences with live-Tweeting of speeches; I’d like to compile a cautionary tale about it here at vsotd.com. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

If Abraham Lincoln lived today, would he talk like we do?

April 15, 2013
By David Murray

“So, four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent an amazing new nation, right?, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are at some level created, sort of, equal.”

(Click on the links to be reminded of my mild objections to these au courant oral language habits.) —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Well, when you say it like that … Computer speaks the unvarnished truth about speechwriting

April 9, 2013
By David Murray

A computerized voice describes the speechwriter’s job in this You Tube version of the speechwriter entry on Wikipedia, and unintentional hilarity ensues. (Or is it just me?) —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

PR agency needs thought leadership—STAT!

April 3, 2013
By David Murray
Last week, I received a message on LinkedIn:
“The speech is for a mobile payments industry audience; looking for something ‘visionary,’ however. … We are working on an extremely tight timeline—a week.” —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

Speechwriting help wanted: Finally, a little honesty in advertising

March 26, 2013
By David Murray

A job listing this week issued from the firm managed by veteran headhunter Smooch Repovich Reynolds (yes, her real name) included this sentence: “the talent who will be considered for this role must have a proven track record working with CEOs and senior management team members working across all executive communications and speechwriting platforms, with little or no direction from those leaders.”

How much speechwriter grief could be spared if more help-wanted ads contained such candor? A lot. Of course, now they’re only going to get applications from the most cynical speechwriting mercenaries, but maybe that’s what they’re looking for anyway.

This is not Smooch Reynolds’ first rodeo. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

“Pay the writer!” Words to live by

March 19, 2013
By David Murray

Viewer discretion advised, as this message is delivered with suitable profanity. —DM

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to our RSS feed!

 
 
1010 E. Missouri Ave.   Phoenix, Arizona 85014   +1 888 MCMURRY
Vital Speeches of the Day is proudly powered by WordPress